Do The HRC & Gay Rights Advocates Hate The Female Gender?

The President of Oklahoma Wesleyan University, Dr. Everett Piper recently stood strong against the forced intrusion of the government as it seeks to enforce LBGT rights. 

What makes Dr. Piper's position unique, is that as President of a well renown University he has taken a definitive and unambiguous stand on issues of right now importance, pointing directly at the hidden agenda behind the "news cycle fluff" and the bullying and name calling of gay rights organizations and liberal media organizations. The issue, at heart, as he has outlined, and to which we at the Dunamis Word concurs, is discrimination and even hatred against women.

The HRC (Human Rights Campaign), the supposed champion of gay rights, suckered our extreme, liberal left, led government into supporting policies that would make colleges and institutions of higher learning, become more "transparent" (in their language) as it pertains to LGBT rights and transgenderism under Title IX, even calling for sanctions against universities that do not facilitate cross gender men, seeking to portray themselves as women, suggesting that failure to recognize these men as women, and provide opportunities to them under Title IX, is not something that religious organizations and Universities should be able to be exempt from, and should cause penalties and sanctions against Universities who's statements and missions did not accommodate actions of transgender men. 

What this does in actually is equivocates over the gender of a woman. It diminishes the gender of a woman to something that is negotiable, changing and non-static. This is the ultimate insult to a woman. To tell a woman that all one needs to do is "feel like" a woman, and HE is entitled to and can have a woman's rights...or that a man, is not only able to receive his rights as a man, but also the rights of a woman if he so presents himself as a woman, is a ridiculous and silly notion.

What kind of message is it to say to a woman, that now, men will be exalted to the status of being able to share in activities specifically cut out for you under Title IX and, if he so desires, also able to compete in the men's sports curriculum? Yet, you are equal...  

This is Dr. Piper's retorts as found on the Oklahoma Wesleyan University web site:

Dr. Everett Piper

President, Oklahoma Wesleyan University

On December 21, 2015 The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), one of the nation’s largest LGBT activist groups, issued a letter to the United States Department of Education (DOE) calling for “greater transparency” from Christian colleges and universities. The reason given for this demand includes what the HRC calls a “disturbing trend” of religious schools citing religious reasons for seeking certain exemptions from Title IX. 

Title IX, as you likely know, is the federal law enacted in 1972 primarily for the purpose of giving women equal access to intercollegiate sports. Since its passage, athletic programs and facilities have been made available to women in direct proportion to men at our colleges and universities. As the result, women have enjoyed nearly a 500 percent increase in athletic participation nationwide over the past forty plus years. 

In 2014, however, the DOE issued new guidelines requiring the accommodation of transgendered students.  With this ruling, it became law that, among other outcomes, any biological male who feels that he is female can avail himself of women’s athletic teams, locker rooms, showers, and/or restrooms, and live in a women’s dorm if he wishes. Oklahoma Wesleyan University and several other Christian colleges therefore sought relief under the existing religious exemption provided in Title IX. Thus, the demand from the HRC that the DOE now require Christian schools to “publish comprehensive information about the scope of the exemption they [requested and] received.” 

My response in short – I gladly comply and here’s my report: 

Yes, Oklahoma Wesleyan University requested an exemption. We recognize the ontological and biological dignity of the female. We believe in science and we believe in facts. Being a female is an objective reality and there is little more empirically obvious than one’s sex.  At OKWU we refuse to participate in the misogynistic insult of women by ignoring such self-evident truths. 

Yes, Oklahoma Wesleyan believes women should be granted the dignity of having equal access to athletics, and other programs, as well as their own facilities. Women attending this university will not only have their own basketball and soccer teams, but they, likewise, will have their own restrooms, showers and dorms. 

Yes, Oklahoma Wesleyan reserves the right to discriminate between those who are male and those who are female. To do otherwise would seem to contradict the very premise of Title IX which calls upon us to differentiate female students from male students and to thereby give women the same access to programs as men. If we didn’t “discriminate” in such a way, how in the world would it be possible to comply with Title IX? 

So there’s your report. How much more transparent would you like me to be? At Oklahoma Wesleyan University, we believe that sexual identity is a scientific fact and we refuse to degrade men and women by suggesting otherwise. Yes, we were granted an exemption.  We are pro-women and proud of it!

KUDOS Dr. Piper and Oklahoma Wesleyan University! Thank you for once again taking a stand and placing the issue in perspective. 

Only under the current extreme left liberal leadership is a woman's place in society questioned. Even "Dumb Donald", who would allow a male (BRUCE Jenner)  into a woman's bathroom, and who encourages North Carolina to reverse its stand in favor of public decency...CONTINUE TO STAND NC!...is adding to the thoughts that being a woman and rights specific to woman are mythical, changeable and subject to the whims of a man's feelings and emotions. 

Conclusion

If the church would make such a clear and clarion call, maybe they would think twice before asking for political endorsements, or better yet, they would actually use the bible to determine whether believers should endorse anyone before they come to us seeking endorsement giving reasons to embrace and promote the sin that we preach against.

If gay advocates don't hate women, one can't tell it by the silly notions they are raising. To encourage a man, born by gender, to use a woman's restroom is SICKENING and SILLY!!!! Their demand displays that they believe a woman's rights are to be compromised and that being a woman is simply a MYTH...

How many woman are willing to agree with them on that? Are you a myth? Or are you a real woman deserving your rights? I would be willing to believe that most, if not all of my readers, like most, if not all of America (with the exclusion of gay advocates) would agree with the latter.

Blessed!