Brooklyn's Call For More Police, Not Less & Marxism's Dilemma

Parents & Families of  recent NYC Murders

In light of the Black Lives Matter, Marxist inspired anarchy that has shaken our inner cities, facilitated murder, and delivered all sorts of mayhem in the streets, citizens are finally seeing the process of the "utopian" vision of Marxism and that of the Black Lives Matter organization. 

Recently, Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams called for NYC to reinstate its recently disbanded 600 member anti-crime unit which BLM and other community RE-organizers took as a "win" when the unit was decommissioned. At the same time groups like BLM encouraged protesters to violate stay at home orders, pandemic restrictions and everything else the Department of Health had put in place to combat covid 19, and managed in the process to seduce Mayors, Governors, City ans State Officials and even major corporate heads to take part in the alleged protests for justice. . 

What's The Problem?

Borough President Eric Adams & NYC Mayor de Blasio

As I've noted HERE and HERE the problem is that crime in the streets has increased as BLM and like organizations receive concession from cities and governments and financial contributions to implement their alleged "reforms" within our communities. It seems that the people they claim to be fighting for are the ones continuing to be killed, raped and robbed, and this time without police hope of police mitigation  or help in obtaining justice because political leaders have been ideologically seduced and most leaders, who happen to be DEMOCRAT, embrace the insistent rambling of the Marxist organization and those they have empowered to carry out their anarchy in these respective areas. 

Marxism's Dilemma

The Death Of The Sacrificial Lambs

I'd like to simply say here that Marxism/Communism has never had an issue with killing and sacrificing millions of every age for its purpose. For instance we must remember Mau Tse Tung in his Great Leap Forward ideology, is said to have killed 20 million to 46 million Chinese people in just 5 short years from 1958 to 1962. Interestingly enough Mau's idol was former Communist leader, Joseph Stahlin, who was said to have killed or orchestrated the murder and starvation of over 20 million Russians in his lust and zeal for power. Then there was Cambodian leader Pol Pot, who was also a Marxist and General Secretary of the Communist Party of Kampuchea, that killed and tortured nearly 25% of Cambodia's 7 million citizens, followed by the Khmer Rouge, a Communist Party that is said to have killed another 1.7 to 3 million Cambodians from 1975 to 1979.   

Patrice Collours
BLM Founder &
"trained Marxist"

What am I saying? The murder of innocents is NOTHING to Marxist ideology. YES THIS IS THE SAME IDEOLOGY THAT BLACK LIVES MATTER EMBRACES and claims to be "trained" in. In nearly every instance, it seems that the death of the innocents and loss of life in the process of change while embracing this twisted political system, is only collateral damage. 

Ask yourself, have ANY of the leaders and alleged "trained Marxists" of BLM spoke out against violence or the murder of the innocents in the cities they parade and encourage the murder of police? Have they called ANY of the mothers and or fathers who have lost children to idiots having gun fights in public places and or simply killing indiscriminately? I'll venture to guess that the answer is NOPE!!!! WHY? Because the death of these and the increasing violence serve the purpose of their organizational and Marxist goals, which begin with creating public unrest, reframing the history and success of America and American values, removing a sitting President, and then overturning the complete political system and process of the United States, using socialism to recreate America as a Communist State.

Remember this however, as I stated on Facebook:

Marxism & Marx's Specter

In 1945, two months after winning WWII, young British voters turned from Winston Churchill to Clement Attlee, an undercover Marxist who had infiltrated the Labor Party.

Act 1: Nationalize the Healthcare system
Subsequent Acts: Nationalize finance, auto, coal, steel communications, & civil aviation.
The BRITISH ECONOMY COLLAPSED WITHIN 5 YEARS

Jaguar and Rolls Royce had to be financially bailed out by other countries in order to survive

In 1950 Great Britian reelected Winston Churchill, but spent the next EIGHTEEN years undoing the damage that Attlee's Marxist Specter gov't had done.

Marx's Specter is the first noun outlined in the Communist Manifesto. It never dies and does not change. And as such is one of the most dangerous and devastating political and social ideas in history. If we fail to learn from history we are destined to repeat it. Source: "Disinformation" by Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa & Ronald J. Rychlak WND Books, Washington, DC, 2013 Pgs. 309-311

I for one intend to fight FOR America and against the change of our culture and cultural values to Marxism, sot socialism and or Communism. I invite those who want to make America better, but at the same time retain American values and freedoms, to join me in this cause.

Email me at IMBKCAC@GMAIL.COM to join the Fight For America!

Blessed!

Read more!

Women, Mathematics & Evolution

Recently on NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams there was a story about how new discoveries have disproved the myth that women were less intelligent mathematicians and less able to perform mathematically than their male counterparts. Evidently for years the comparative ability and intelligence of women have been called into question. This continues even in modern academic circles.

Since the evidence was so overwhelming against the notion that women were less intelligent, the question was asked "where did these thoughts and speculations originally come from?" Quite interestingly enough, none of the professionals interviewed could give an answer or even reference a particular study as to how and when the myth that women were less intelligent than men in math began. Well, of course in my many debates with atheists and in reading many blogs regarding evolutionary and naturalistic thought, it didn't take me long to find the answer that many of these "supposed" professors missed, overlooked and I believe intentionally minimized to further promote their naturalistic agenda.

Surprise, Surprise, Surprise!

Darwinian Evolution, taught in every public school science class as simply the Theory Of Evolution, out of all possible explanations and conduits for all of these horrible presuppositions was the answer that the scientist in the NBC story were afraid to render as the exact birthplace of theories that women were less intelligent and could not preform mathematically on the same scale as men. Now most people when confronted with this information say,

"NO, that couldn't be? Why would educators allow such a biased view of natural order to be taught in our classrooms?"

Individuals who say this haven't been introduced to the reality of naturalism and non-theistic teachings regarding origins of man and current conditions. When I say that there is a CESSPOOL of garbage being passed off as educational material, I'm being generous. It's much worse than I could state here. Look at this for example:

"[Man] attains a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, history, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages... [that] the average mental power in man must be above that of women." ~ Charles Darwin, "The Descent of Man in Relation to Sex" (New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1896), 564.

A "higher eminence", "average mental power above women"? Now to all the women reading this, this is the basis of what our children are being taught in school today when it comes to evolutionary theory. Also, please keep in mind that these ideals and "theories" were valued by Communist founders Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels.

Engels wrote to Marx, "Darwin, whom I am just now reading, is splendid." ~ Conway Zirkle, "Evolution, Marxian Biology and the Social Scene", Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959, pp.85-87

Marx wrote back to Engels on December 19, 1860, saying, "This is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view."~ Conway Zirkle, Evolution, "Marxian Biology and the Social Scene", Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959, pp.85-87

There's more. Darwin spoke the following concerning women's abilities:

"powers of intuition, of rapid perception, and perhaps of imitation are characteristic of the lower races, and therefore of a past and lower state of civilisation." ~ Charles Darwin, "The Descent of Man, The Modern Library", New York, p. 873.

One of the leading proponents of naturalism and evolutionary theory was psychologist Gustav LeBon. He stated the following based on his understanding of naturalism:

"[Even in] the most intelligent races [there] are large numbers of women whose brains are closer in size to those of gorillas than to the most developed male brains. This inferiority is so obvious that no one can contest it for a moment; only its degree is worth discussion." ~ Stephen Jay Gould, "The Mismeasure of Man" (New York: Norton, 1981), 104-105.

In the world of Darwinian Evolution SIZE really does matter, but common sense doesn't.

According to Charles Darwin and most modern evolutionists such as Richard Dawkins who continue to hold to evolutionary theory as a viable science, the size of the brain indicates intelligence. A woman's brain being smaller (closer to the size of a Gorilla's brain) makes her less intelligent. In fact Mr. Dawkins himself has said that new atheists in particular must push harder to make their naturalistic agenda heard and respected.

OK. Women still don't believe me, let Mr.LeBon finish his own thoughts regarding this:

"Women represent the most inferior forms of human evolution and...are closer to children and savages than to an adult, civilized man. They excel in fickleness, inconstancy, absence of thought and logic, and incapacity to reason. Without a doubt, there exists some distinguished women, very superior to the average man, but they are as exceptional as the birth of any monstrosity, as for example, of a gorilla with two heads. Consequently, we may neglect them entirely." ~ Stephen Jay Gould, "The Mismeasure of Man" (New York: Norton, 1981), 104-105.

David N. Menton, Ph.D., The Religion of Nature: Social Darwinism, St. Louis MetroVoice, September 1994, Vol. 4, No. 9, said that based on Darwin's tenets and beliefs many anthropologists bought into the "brain size" issue even falsifying the evidence to make it fit their presuppositional thinking and racial and gender biases and discrimination.

Who's the culprit? Darwinian Evolutionary Theory that taught and continues to teach that women were less intelligent, less capable and less important to society than men.

This is big business and there are major implications for professors and individuals willing to step out and expose the many lies of evolution. As preachers and ministers, we have a mandate to "be instant in season, out of season;" (2 Tim. 4:2) This topic usually genders much debate from supporters of evolution and naturalism. Opponents usually use the bible as an emotion tool to suggest that God despises women throughout scripture but the opposite is actually true.

The fight is on against creationism as Professor Dawkins outlines. However creationism when it comes to the place of women is much superior on all fronts than evolutionary theory. Example:

• Women are created from the same "stuff" as men. In other words man was made in the "Image" and "Likeness" of God, therefore women share those same attributes, not the attributes of an animal or Gorilla or Ape as evolutionists love to point out. (Gen. 1:27 ~ "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.")

• In God's system women are called to be leaders, used by God to deliver Israel. (Deborah, Ruth, Esther etc.)

• In the Old Testament, women are very instrumental in the survival of both the family and the nation.

• In the Old Testament, the critic is hard pressed to find ONE instance where God endorses the rape, molestation or abuse of women.

• In the Old Testament women were able to approach and receive from God without a male intermediary, indicating that women had every ability as an equal with men to access God.

• Women are valued and honored throughout the biblical narrative and considered to be smart both spiritually and naturally. (Pr. 12:4, 31:10)

• In the New Testament the blood of Jesus levels the playing field of traditions even within a patriarchal society by calling women and men equal in Christ Jesus. (Gal. 3:28 ~ "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.")

I thought it interesting to see how vehemently and avvid some individuals are in stating that evolution is a valid system. As we can see Darwainian evolution is the worst possible mix of confusion for anyone to adopt and accept. Theistic evolution is an even worse proposition no matter how badly many of us want to find a scientific ground or basis by which to defeat the criticisms of the enemy.

Why not simply just believe God and HIS WORD? After all the criticism it still stands the test.

Nex time I'll discuss the rank racism of Darwainian Evolution. Stay tuned.

Blessed!

Resources:

The Face That Demonstrates The Farce Of Evolution ~ Hank Hanegraaff

The Case For A Creator ~ Lee Strobel

Handbook Of Biblical Evidences ~ John Ankerberg & John Weldon

Center For Creation Science ~ Walt Brown Ph.D.

Read more!