Charlie Kirk At Cambridge

It amazes me to hear many of my fellow Black ministers attempt to reconcile the murder of Charlie Kirk with God's justice and even more, with the Law of Attraction. It certainly lets me know why the Black church has lost much of her influence in the world and nearly all of her power with God. WE ARE A BACKSLIDDEN CHURCH! Churches led by White ministers and suburban congregations have always had issues, but we have fallen a long way even into the enjoyment of public executions. Seems that we would be the last ones to enjoy or relish over such displays after all that has been done to us, as a Black community even in the post civil war era. Shameful!

The sad part is that some don't even recognize what Charlie Kirk was doing and what his ministry was. Many didn't understand that he not only had a political mission, but that he was also a Christian apologist. Further, many have no clue as to what true community engagement is, or how to preach, teach and stand for the gospel outside of the 4 walls of the church or to them that disagree, and or what the gospel ultimately means. 

Instead, many Black ministers have resorted to a culturally centered and culturally sensitive gospel based on their perception of racism, which has been redefined by them to suit their audience. This type of Black theology, in many instances is led by sinners, who cannot spiritually perceive the door and know little about the gospel and them that delivered it in holy writ. 

I admit. Charlie Kirk cannot be compared to Malcom X, or Dr. MLKing...Why? Because CHARLIE PREACHED THE GOSPEL and was faithful to our Lord Jesus Christ in message and in deed. Certainly many Black ministers preach truth and live the same as well, however the problem is that too many, both ethnic and urban, both Black and White, use the gospel as a means to a personal end. I'll expound on this in my next article. 

Charlie did what Paul did, he went to Mars Hill and preached and helped changed the world and shook the devil from his foundation. These preachers are FREE to speak in disapproval of him as they chose because of people like Mr. Kirk that promoted a free and fair exchange of ideals and values. 

Don't like me and my commentary or assessment? Join the club...you ain't heard nothing yet!

Below, enjoy the debate and effort to do what we should be doing...win the lost (as opposed to preaching to folk who already agree with us or basing what we preach on ethnicity or even gender)

Blessed!

Read more!

Vaccine Efficacy. The Challenge To Scientific Debate

• Did you know that scientific peer-reviewed literature claims that over 150,000 individuals have died due to the covid vaccine?
  

• Do you know what the VAERS system is, what it documents, and why it is important for all of us to know?
  

• 
  Did you know that there is a hot and robust scientific debate over requirements for  children to be injected with an EUA vaccine because there is a growing amount of evidence that they are especially harmful to youth?
  

If you believe the vaccines are safe Steven Kirsch says show proof, put-up or shut-up!

In the United States and elsewhere, millions have been vaccinated and millions more are being subjugated against their will to the vaccine and unanswered questions and scientific confusion abounds. In Australia, for example, the unvaccinated cannot be outside for more than 20 minutes without police intervention and arrest. Even the Vatican, no matter how effective your prayers, the Pope says you cannot work there without having been vaccinated.

We Destroyed Smallpox With A Vaccine

TRUE, however unlike the smallpox vaccine, which was neither under an EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) or developed and created through the use of aborted fetal cells, the smallpox vaccine actually had efficacy, ie: in addition to treatment, the smallpox vaccine actually prevented and reduced disease prevalence by 99%. Although originally purported to do so, neither of the covid 19 mRNA vaccines or the J&J vaccine, reduce covid 19 prevalence nor stop its transmissibility. The whole world is nearly being forced to receive a EUA vaccine, which DOES NOT reduce the prevalence of Covid 19 and does not stop it from being transmitted. 

This vaccine is being forced upon the public while contrary positions are being censored, individuals including doctors and top scientists, silenced, safe and ethical treatments being avoided and restricted, and, in many cases, scientific opinions and conclusions removed from the general public and knowledge and information databases.

Not only should such actions present a problem to anyone claiming to be a "free-thinker" (as censorship should be) this has led to individual shaming, broken families, employees dismissal, businesses being shut down, and governments discarding and even redefining personal freedoms, while individual rights are diminished and dismissed all together. SEGREGATION and DISCRIMINATION have become acceptable again and promoted by political leaders. In all, it is a day that will not soon be forgotten upon history.

And The SCIENCE Says:

The scientific community is confused and in shambles over covid 19 vaccine, treatment and care. Leading authorities such as the CDC claim nothing is wrong and push full throttle for more vaccine distribution and mandates even though so called "breakthrough infections" are rising even among 100% vaccinated populations.

THE DEBATE CHALLENGE: WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH?

With an application to make sure individuals are qualified, and a $3,000 honorarium to medical professionals that wish to tote the line of vaccine efficacy, those who believe in vaccine efficacy have their chance to prove their position once and for all, based on the SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE.

THIS PUBLIC DEBATE WILL ATTEMPT TO GET TO A SCIENTIFIC CONCLUSION AND ADDRESS 2 VITAL QUESTIONS:

• 1- Kirsch and his team have asserted that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the COVID vaccines and that they can defend that number using multiple methods. They also point out that the peer-reviewed scientific literature supports their assertion. The CDC says the vaccine hasn’t killed anyone. Which is correct?

• 2- Kirsch and his team have asserted that the COVID vaccines kill more people than they are expected to save over a 6-month efficacy period and that this is true for all ages. Again, they point out that the peer-reviewed scientific literature supports their assertion. The CDC says the vaccine risk-benefit is justified for ages 12 and above. Which is correct?

The "Dream Team", those who believe the vaccines are problematic, are already assembled. Kirsch and associates are soliciting the nations top vaccine advocates to present their proof and convince the public of vaccine efficacy against increasing evidence to the contrary.

In our opinion, this could not happen soon enough. There is not an area of life unaffected by the vaccine and the so called "health mandates" regarding them. People are loosing their livelihood and retirements over what could be the greatest political and medical fraud in history and WE THE PEOPLE from all over the world deserve and demand to know the truth against government narratives, coercion and lies.

Who will take the challenge? 

Blessed!

REFERENCE:

Trialsitenews:
https://trialsitenews.com/challenge-to-the-scientific-community-its-time-for-honest-and-open-debate-on-vaccine-safety/

Read more!

What's Behind It All?" A Debate About God, Science & The Universe

Many Things I could say about this debate and I will save them for commentary for those who desire to comment...I will say that Meyer sick is worth more than Krauss and his views well! 

Blessed!

Read more!

Atheist SmackDown

Physicist Dr. Lawrence Krauss 

Philosopher Dr. W.L. Craig

"Accidents Happen All The Time" 

~ Physicist Dr. Lawrence Krauss

"All Accidents Have A Cause" 

~ Philosopher Dr. William L. Craig

In yet another in the series of Atheism's Greatest Hits, Biblical Scholar and Philosopher Dr. William Lane Craig debated Scientist and Physicist Dr. Lawrence Krauss at N.C. State University on Wed. March 30, 2011 sponsored by Campus Crusade For Christ. The debate topic was "Is There Evidence For God?" 

Using Bayesian Probability Theory as a base Dr. Craig offered 5 basic arguments:

• The existence of contingent beings
• The origin of the universe
• The fine tuning of the universe for intelligent life
• Objective moral values and duties in the world
• Historical facts of /the resurrection of Jesus Christ

Read more!

Dan Barker...Da Pimp Of Atheism!

Former Christian Dan Barker and Dinesh D'Souza Debate

Former Christian Dan Barker now turned anti-Christ advocate and Dinesh DSouza debate the existence of God. If you have a couple of hours go through the complete video. Also, at least Dinesh understands the Philosophical Metaphysical Naturalism and atheism of Darwinian evolution as you will hear him argue in the vid. The scientific principles that we've discussed in "Is Evolution Science" and "Does Science Presuppose Atheism" and other posts such as "Unnaturally Selected, 150 Years Of Deception" provide a good foundation for understanding the arguments and reading between the multiple lines of Barker's obfuscations.

The atheists claim that Dinesh was emotional, and threw red herrings and ad hominems. Quite the opposite was true. Barker threw out all kinds of red herrings. I guess the godless say anything to try to divert from the truth that Dan Barker was HANDLED, and that atheism, as a world view, makes some fanciful leaps of unfounded faith as Dinesh allows Barker to reveal. 

Read more!