Tuesday, June 5, 2012

"Queer In The 21st Century" ~ When Gay Marriage Arrives

As the argument over gay marriage has progressed, there are many individuals who simply don't know how to reconcile the issue. The devil has done an adequate job of confusing the church over the issue of moral sexual sin. Others are confused over how the church should govern secular life and affairs as it pertains to homosexual "rights". Then there are others who are, as I have stated, confused over whether gay marriage is an issue of equality or equal access. 

With all of those considerations what we can do is look and see what gay advocacy has done and continues to do to get an idea of what to expect and what to stand against as we move forward in effort to reclaim the moral base and values that has afforded us the freedoms that we experience. 

"Past Performance Is The Best Indicator Of Future Results"

You will see a phrase similar to that above in most investment prospectuses and brochures. However many of them say that past performance IS NOT an indicator of future results to safeguard the provider of the investment against the risk of misrepresentation and fraud. 

On the contrary, within the homosexual marriage arena, one can expect that what has happened in the past is an indicator of what one should expect in the future. For example, what NO ONE should be confused or caught off guard regarding is the fact that when gay marriage is the law that a public re-engineering of social morality will occur, and ALL CHILDREN, especially those within the public school system, will be the target of the re-engineering. 

Anyone that has read this blog knows about what happened to Dr. David Parker in 2004 when he tried to stop the public school from redefining sexual morality for his kindergartner. He got arrested and was told by the state (Massachusetts, the first state to legalize gay marriage) they THEY knew better how to teach his child than he did, because homosexual marriage was the law and his child had a legal obligation to simply accept gay moral standards.

Boston, A Kind Of Queer Place To Be

Dr. Parker's situation took place in 2004, what we didn't know was that in 2005, in the same state a book entitled the "Little Black Book Volume 2.0, Being Queer In The 21st Century" was given to school aged children in public schools under the direction of the good ole gay advocacy group GSLEN, and paid for with public dollars, because "IT'S DA LAW" and they have the RIGHT to educate your children in the law and how to be a law abiding citizen, don't they???

As you can see, not only did the book have instructions on how and when to use condoms, it also came with complete instructions on how to find and access gay clubs, how to conduct gay sexual activities and how to just overall enjoy gay sex. Needless to say, the book was distributed in raw form. Very vulgar, over the top and simply matter of factly.

An article regarding this atrocious rendering given to children can be found HERE. BE CAREFUL, this is very graphic and vulgar information. Remember, this is what they have given to children at taxpayer expense.

Gay Social & Moral Re-engineering 

Through projects such as ALLY week, and other initiatives, children are certainly the target of the gay advocacy movement. It is simply about changing attitudes regarding homosexuality and teaching children that there is more to life than what their parents dare to teach them. This is even more prevalent in public education when gay marriage becomes the law. 

A Bogus Diversity Argument  

As I have engaged individuals willing to share reasons why gay marriage should be accepted, they invariably assert that the acceptance of gay marriage is about the acceptance of sexual diversity and everyone should be willing to accept diversity. 

The problem is what gay advocates don't address publicly or in debate. That is, why should homosexuality be favored as a sexual relationship, defined and given rights under the law, when other sexual relationships such as polygamy, for example are ignored and condemned?  In other words, is the effort is simply to accept sexual "diversity" and not ignore classes of free people who consent to sexual arrangements of their choosing, then how can homosexuality be singled out as a sexual activity deserving a place in the law while other sexual arrangements remain in obscurity? It would seem that the very act of singling out homosexuals and their brand of sexual activity and providing some sort of special provision is not only an ultimate act of discrimination, but it is also totally based on subjective moral value standards. 

A Spiritual & Moral Seduction

This simple seduction into the thought that there is something better than what you have received or that "we know more and what's best for you" I have termed the "serpent syndrome". Isn't this the same type of sentiment that the serpent, representing the devil, applied in the garden when he spoke to Eve?

Genesis 3: 1-71-Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? 2-And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3-But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. 4-And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5-For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. 6-And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. 7-And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.
Unbelief, which is the root of all sin, is based in the thought that God has hidden something and that there is a secret knowledge that could improve life. This is the calling card of gay advocacy and the danger of homosexual advocacy in general. The thought that there is something "hidden" or something that God doesn't given or allowed is the angle that is being used to bring this ungodly agenda front and center. In addition, the thought that God has somehow deceived mankind, by placing a woman in a man's body or a male in a female's body speaks that the character and nature of God is somehow deficient. The thought that men and women have to manipulate nature denies that we are a creation of God. Under this world view, we are simply animals and products of biological processes and can be expected to act any way that we see in nature. This is the LIE of gay advocacy and the SIN that they are trying to pass off as some mere simple part of the life of some as a "diversity". 

In all of this, there is hope. However, one must deal with the fact that God is not deceptive, neither has he obscured truth from any of us because he is TRUTH.  

I wonder, when you are listening to debates on gay marriage, will any of them mention the information distributed by GSLEN? If you're like me, you probably won't hear a word, but don't worry, you will after the fact. 


Related Reading:
Homosexuality & Moral Harm
When Gay Day Comes Your Way


  1. Hi Pastor Harvey.
    The whole worlds' gone nuts, I tell 'ya. Since I've known you (about 5 years now), it seems like half the country has nose-dived into the abyss with their eyes wide open, many of whom call themselves "christian" (let God sort them out).

    I blame the church, myself included. There's no reverential fear of the Lord taught - just do what feels right. Moral standards are simply subjective when there's no law or that pesky Lawgiver. Shoot! Shouldn't everyone do what makes them happy?

    God help us. I wish I knew how much longer before His return, because I've about given up on hope for revival and am to the point of not caring if the whole country goes to hell in a handbasket. The god most have is of their own making and they aren't interested in the God of the Bible. They just don't want to know.

    Now I believe in Grace and more Grace, and that Jesus died for ALL our sins. A true born-again believer will not practice sin, though he/she will still sin. And the self-described christian that condones homosexuality because everyone should be "happy", well...they have made their choice, haven't they? They have rejected the Holy God of the bible for what feels right in their own eyes.

    Question. Can they do that with the Holy Spirit living inside them Who guides them in the way of truth? You know where the Bible says that no man can say "Jesus is Lord" without the Holy Spirit (paraphrased). Well, can anyone say marriage between two men or two woman is an ok thing WITH the Holy Spirit?

  2. Laura,

    Great to hear from you my friend. You are correct this world is as backwards as I've ever seen it.

    These people are devoid of the Holy Spirit for sure...Even though they try to convince us that God has approved of their lifestyle choice, the fact is that God doesn't create confusion and he is not a trickster or a deceiver by placing womanly desires in a man's body or vice-versa.

    For anyone to endorse that concept proves by itself that they don;t believe in the GOd of the bible. They believe in the god of self.

    Even with and through our faults, let us simply keep standing for truth and righteousness. It will all be worth it in the end.


I've switched to real time comments for most posts. Refresh your screen if you post and do not see it right away. Please send me an email if you try to post a comment and cannot do so. Dunamis1@netzero.com. Thanks.