The TRUE Sons Of God Revealed

The murder of Charlie Kirk, the near assassination of now President Trump and other threats to murder public officials and near misses, have revealed something, that many of us have known for a long time, but that has been publicly revealed...

No matter how people feel about themselves, their actions and joy over the unrighteous act of murder, proves that they do not belong to God and are not the children of God. 

Let me say it this way...for all those "church folk" (and there were many across the country) who applauded the murder of Charlie Kirk, thinking this was the "righteousness of God" or the occult, "Law of Attraction" at work...Or those claiming to be "Christians" excited for the near murder of President Donald Trump and a twisted sense of satisfaction for the murder of the MN. State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband Mike and who are happy to sign on to the threat of people's lives because of political differences and views...

We may not know who you are, but we know what you are. What's more, we also know who your real father actually is...

It's right here:

John 8:40-41a ~ "40-But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41a-Ye do the deeds of your father. "

John 8:44a ~ "44a-Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning,"

You, with all your glory, titles and education, and in many cases, your theological degree, you are indeed a murderer and the son/daughter of a murderer aka: satan himself!

WELCOME To Reality

The devil is a "murderer" and was full of murder from his beginning. Evidently he thought this could be hidden from God. He was obviously wrong. His exposure led him into the the "Nino Brown syndrome"..."If I go down, I'm taking everyone else with me too"...

Therefore, because of his murderous intent, he is represented by a name given to him by God. satan or "accuser, one who accuses"...His intent is to bring accusation against God's people and everything that belongs to HIM. To, in essence, "murder us" before God. Those who applaud murder, and this type of destructive disruption, are the children of satan. Those who rationalize murder, are his children of as well.

The murder of Charlie Kirk was not a propitiation for sin, neither was it an appeasement done towards God. It was a self-centered act done in part because demons couldn't stand and or tolerate what he was saying.

The Return Of Jesus & The Actions Of Man

When Jesus was asked what would be the sign of his return, he said the following:

* That many would come in his name claiming to be the Messiah (Mt. 24:5)

[So many performing so many wonders that even the "elect" would be tempted to believe - Mt. 24: 24]

* There would be an excess of wars and rumors of wars (Mt. 24:6)

* That there would be famines and earthquakes (shakings) in peculiar places (Mt. 24:7)

* That his followers would face persecution (Mt. 24:9)

* Those that follow him would be hated by all nations (Mt. 24:9)

* That there would be an apostasy of faith (Mt. 24:10)

* That there would be a rank hatred that would arise (Mt. 24:10)

* That many false prophets would arise (Mt. 24:11)

* Societal lawlessness will be multiplied (Mt. 24:12)

* Love, care and concern for humanity would wane or fall off (Mt. 24:12)

* The gospel would be preached to all parts of the world (Mt. 24:14)

* That the "days would be shortened" for the perseverance of his elect (Mt. 24:22) [This indicates that the space or time allotted for something to happen and or to take place would be reduced, therefore speeding up the overall process]

Jesus says that all of these things would be happening. I would take it that these event would occur at an unusually notable pace or rate.

He then goes on to say this:

Mt. 24:36-39 ~ 36-But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. 37-But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 38-For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39-And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

Now, some believe that Jesus has already returned and gone. That sentiment is about the most biblically illiterate position and one that was argued against within scripture. (2 Tim. 2:18) However, individuals are free to believe what they wish, even if it is silly...

Then others believe the events Jesus foretold were specifically regarding the events that took place around and near AD70 when Roman Emperor Titus destroyed The Temple leading to the diaspora of Jews from the Land of Israel. 

While, I believe that past events are shades and shadows of what will happen, I DO NOT believe the events specified by Jesus in Matthew 24 have occurred in their full extent as of yet. There will be an intensity and more of a frequency of all of these things and more. 

Only GOD Knows

From the words of Jesus, we find very interesting additional information. 

1- Not even heaven (the angelic host) know when HIS return will occur. 

2- Men would be doing things similar to what they were doing in "the days of Noah"

3- Because of the deceptions and preoccupation with flesh and materialism, mankind would be oblivious to the coming of the Son of Man and caught totally off guard. 

The "Days Of Noah"

I find it fascinating that Jesus linked his return to the "days" or times of Noah in similarity. In Genesis we find that in Noah's time, the intents, thoughts, and hearts of men was evil continually:

Genesis 6:5 ~ And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually."

This indicates that the "age of innocence" had certainly passed. Man, who was now in control of his own aspirations, took it upon himself to be filled with the "intent" to think and do evil. This passage doesn't simply deal with the "thoughts" of men and mankind. It deals with the "intent" of the thoughts. That is most certainly a very deep place that only God can discern.  

Whether inspired by fallen angels or not, in Noah's day man's mind was working in such a fashion that the imagination and invention of evil was his his preoccupation. From scripture, it wasn't the actions of the angels or their offspring, "the Nephilim" that was God's motivation to return and destroy the works and acts of man and mankind. It was the thoughts and intents of men's hearts and their subsequent actions that had become so disturbing and so unnerving that the only course was to destroy the unrepentant and them who refused to hear HIM. 

The people had taken on the character and attributes of the devil himself. They became self centered, murderous, and callous towards the creation of God in their thoughts and actions thus displaying their subservience to "another" kingdom. A kingdom controlled and inspired by satan himself. A kingdom directed by evil intent, and the working out of evil values including sexual impropriety, immorality, scientifically advanced evil, and ultimately murder itself. 

The Return Of The Sons Of God

The ways of the evil in the "days of Noah", are certainly not unique to modern times, however, the inventions of evil and the intent of wickedness has reared its especially ugly head and the proverbial "genie" (djinn aka: evil spirit) has been let out of the bottle. A dimension of evil has been opened and this will not be put out, subdued or overcome in its totality until Jesus returns. 

Rom. 8:19 ~  For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.

The fallen angels, who rejected the reign and the Kingdom of God, and who were disobedient to the will of God, will never find respite for their rebellious decision. Theirs is an eternal and perpetual appointment with the Lake of Fire which was specifically created for them, which is something that they did not know. (Rev. 20:10)  Those of us, who carry on and carry out the will of God through Christ Jesus have been given the power to become the "Sons of God"

John 1:12 ~ But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

While I certainly understand the theological implication of what I am setting forth, I yet believe, that though we will never be in the "angelic" class of being, being a Son of God,  is a complete replacement of those who were previously called the sons of God, and we see the angelic host, throughout scripture, called the "Sons Of God". (Gen. 6:4, Job 1:6, 2:1)

Those angels who rebelled, those demonic entities who now wreak havoc in the earth, and want this realm for themselves, and plague you, your family and all that has been reserved for God, are no longer HIS sons in the biblical sense...Through Christ Jesus WE have been given this ability to overcome the evil one and all of his tricks, and now stand as servants of God ready and willing to do HIS bidding and have access to the power of the Holy Ghost to complete HIS task.

Acts 1:8 ~  But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.

The obedient servant of God is exactly who the creation, the earth, and everything in this vast universe anticipates to destroy the order of evil that entered creation and break the stronghold that the enemy has upon humanity and creation itself.  satan seeks an greater grip, and would have such if we, the true sons of God, would abdicate our responsibility, shut up, go away, and give up the fight for the redemption of our family, our communities and the church itself.    

But, NOT SO...we are STRONG IN THE LORD AND IN HIS POWER and ready for battle. 

I will not be deceived as so many have been. We have been truly let down and disappointed by those whom we never anticipated would be a part of the devil, sin and evil in any way, yet alone enthusiastic, melancholy or even enthusiastic about murder and the destruction of God's creation. 

However, should we really be surprised? When we have pulpits and leaders silent about pedophilia, abortion and the murder of babies, encouraging the mutilation and defiling the image of God through gender bending transexual surgeries, and alleged advanced medical treatment and the defilement of humanity and corruption of moral values and corruption of Christian values. 

Behind the true and uncompromising church, we have a weak church, which is at times more visible than the true church, led by those who encourage, if not endorse, hate, evil and murder and find a way to rationalize anti-biblical morality and have no conscience remorse or regret about their actions. Who would think that anyone could ever criticize notions of Christian nationalism, and reframe it as a call to "White Supremacy", while at the same time accepting notions of Sharia and Sharia Law found within radical and even basic interpretations of Islam? 

This is the problem and what we see in Jesus words regarding the false prophet and deception. It is the dumbing down of righteousness, true holiness and the true Kingdom of God. 

Blessed!

Read more!

"All Nations Shall Rise Against Israel" ~ The UN Security Council

It has begun...

On Sept. 18th, 2025, 14 of the 15 members of the United Nations Security Council, and 4 out of the 5 permanent members of the council, led by Algeria, set forth a cease fire resolution accepting the accusation of the Human Rights Council (HRC) that Israel is engaging in genocide and is committing the height of atrocities of inhumane actions, further demanding that Israel should immediately cease her actions in Gaza, and allow international aid into the region. The United States voted NO on the action and further accused those who drafted the resolution of continued and ongoing anti-semitism. 

14-Therefore prophesy, son of man, and tell Gog that this is what the Lord GOD says: On that day when My people Israel are dwelling securely, will you not take notice of this?e 15-And you will come from your place out of the far north—you and many peoples with you, all riding horses—a mighty horde, a huge army. 16-You will advance against My people Israel like a cloud covering the land. It will happen in the latter days, O Gog, that I will bring you against My land, so that the nations may know Me when I show Myself holy in you before their eyes ~ Ezek 38:14-16

At the same time and on the same day, America's closest ally, Great Britain, has declared its continued intent to recognize the Palestinian State. Remember, there is and remains no Palestinian government or leadership, and a nation called Palestine has never existed. 

Riyad Mansour "The Palestinian Representative To The UN" was especially bombastic and eager to rewrite history claiming Hamas (by proxy of the Palestinian people) to be innocent an d called for the UN to mount an "International Protection Force" ie: soldiers to Gaza,  claiming that his alleged "nation" is a part of the "forces of peace in the world". He went on to assert that Israel was a "killing machine" which had been launched against Palestinians. 

And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth. ~ Zec. 14:12

Why Was The Alleged Cease Fire Resolution Rejected?

There was great debate over this and the only individuals that were interested in laying the full resolution out was the delegation from Israel. Israel outlined that the alleged cease-fire was developed by 10 nations with Algeria leading the charge. The resolution was accepted by all other members of the HRC except the United States. The United States representative denounced the resolution because of its anti-semitic bias. 

In addition to being and anti-semitic document, the additional reasons that the proposal was rejected by the United States were:

• It's language refused to declare that ALL acts of terrorism were inhumane and should be condemned.

• The resolution refused to include any language that would condemn the actions of Hamas. 

• The resolution refused to demand that Hamas lay down its weapons and return all hostages immediately as a condition of peace.

Remember, Hamas is classified as a terrorist group, is an illegitimate government and organization who developed and carried out the unprovoked and disgusting and barbaric attack on Israel on Oct. 7th 2023. Remember, it was Hamas PIGS who beheaded men, women, and children, microwaving children, raping women and defiling the land with the murder of the innocent. Over 1,200 people were brutally murdered and most were innocent civilians, children, unsuspecting families. 

Amar Benjamma of Algeria, in response to Israel's shining the light on why this horrible resolution was rejected by the United States, and Israel claimed that 10 of the elected member nations of the Security Council had drafted and accepted the resolution and that their only aim and focus was on the "famine" and ultimately "genocide" of the Palestinian people and the "revulsion" against the actions of Israel and what is currently happening to the Palestinian people. Nearly refusing to address the absolute atrocities and seemingly glossing over the fact that a terrorist organization is still holding hostages intending to use them as human shields against the attack of Israel, the nations approving of this measure were adamant that Israel was wrong and was a genocidal nation. 

1-And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. 2-And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. ~ Revelation 13:1-2

It is clear that there is a rising hatred against Israel and that is not necessarily because of the actions of Israel. Israel has been a peaceful state and the only free nation in the region. This fight is a spiritual fight against the God of Israel which gave birth to what is called Christianity today. It is that foundation, the foundation of the WORD of TRUTH that is under attack. 

Christianity, and biblical morality is under fire as it has been for a number of years. The world is coming together in effort to push out God and his WORD and replace it with the rule of mankind or humanism. I have noticed this intent is especially broadened when secularism has been set back either by leadership, the courts and or rejected by the people. 

Remember, as I outlined in my articles "The New Enlightenment Pt. 1", and "Not So Wild About Harry & The New Humanism" the Humanist Manifesto of the late Paul Kurtz outlined the following goals:

"…The wider platform for human progress as part of a New Enlightenment needs, I submit, to advocate secularism in the above three senses:
(1) the separation of religion from the state;
(2) the humanization of values that satisfy the deeper interests and needs of human beings; and
(3) the decline of religious practice, entailing the growth of the Human City in place of the City of God."

By whatever means, the devil does not want the people of God to exist. Why? Because through us, and the Spirit of God within us, the world and the devil himself, (or as Enoch lays it out, the children of Nephilim or what we know as evil spirits who were confined to this world in their death) are constrained from performing the full evil and full evil acts that they wish to do in this world. Since God used the flood, to destroy them, their technology, their acts and their works, they have desired to renew and replenish their evil to the fullest upon the Earth, and the only thing that constrains them is The Spirit of the Lord through HIS church which will NOT be defeated!

And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. ~ Mt. 16:18

These are truly evil days. Remember, the acts and ways of the devil and evil will appear to be rooted in reason and the security and safety of humanity. Many will find evil palatable and even desirable. In the church, it will be a focus on everything but what it takes to yield to God and his Spirit. They will cheer for blood as they did with Charlie Kirk and as they wished they could with President Donald Trump. Biblical morality will be set on its ear. It will be era of human reason and the era of human will that will take front and center and set the stage for the anti-Christ and the eschaton or fulfillment of the last days and ultimately, the Kingdom of God. 

And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. ~ Rev. 22:12

Blessed! 

Reference: UN Security Council News

Read more!

Digital Identity. The Mark Of The Beast?

Read: The WEF & The Pandemic

Revelation 13: 16- 18 ~ 16-And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17-And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18-Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

The Great Reset

The Word Economic Forum (WEF) headed by its founder Klaus Schwab, the author of "The Great Reset: Resetting The World" claims that it has a goal of "improving the state of the world" and a mission of "shaping global, regional and industry agendas". From individual consumerism, employee health and mental wellbeing, to farming and how individuals purchase goods and services, the WEF is feverishly seeking to expand its global influence now more than ever in light of the covid pandemic. 

Mr. Schwab has outlined that it is essential for its global corporate stakeholders (a term fashioned through this forum) be committed to reaching "Net Zero" (emissions), integrating concepts of globalization, regionalization and localization to create "meaningful perspectives" for world outlook. The agenda is strongly centered around religiously and systematically reverting the world's demand for fossil fuels to renewable sources at nearly any cost.

One would say, what does the world economic wellbeing have to do with individual identity? I'll show you here in a minute, just bear with me...

The Great Reset Agenda

According to Schwab there are 3 primary components to this Great Reset Agenda. Amazingly we can see the complete WEF agenda rife through President Biden's economic policy and agenda. Through this we can also see why President Donald Trump had to go or be removed from office one way or another, simply because he was not playing by WEF rules. Biden's policies and things that we see in the news just happens to be a variation of WEF policy and goals, including his "Build Back Better" slogan, which is also hailed by the WEF before Biden announced it as his campaign slogan.

Here are the 3 foundations of the WEF agenda:

1- Improve coordination of tax, regulatory and fiscal policy to produce "fairer" outcomes which include changes to wealth taxes, encourage reduction of fossil fuel subsidies and proliferation, change rules regarding intellectual property and trade regulations with the objective of creating a more free and open society and global community.

2- Insure that investments and stimulus center around shared goals of equality and sustainability and focus on "green Infrastructure", "human infrastructure", and incentivizing industries to improve their track record on environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics 

3- Harness all resources of the 4th Industrial revolution to support the public good by addressing health and social challenges. (Which ultimately includes the coordination of verifiable health information)

In conservative news media there have been many questions raised concerning President Biden's "infrastructure" plan and why it includes the new "human infrastructure" at such high levels of contribution. Many have been questioning how infrastructure, which has traditionally focused on roads, highways and other non personal means of helping and making society run, now include  payments for daycare, a "living wage", advance tax credits, a resultant discouragement to marry, more money for social services and other forms of human and individually centered needs. The complete agenda is not an American inspired agenda. It is a globalist agenda inline with WEF goals and objectives. 

Digital Identity: Covid Credential Initiative

I have already pointed out in our article  "The New Covid ID Healthcare Certificate"  that due to the alleged covid 19 pandemic a "covid pass" was being created that would track the medical and health status of individuals all over the world. At the time I wrote that article, there were no mandates or proposed mandates requiring anyone to get a covid vaccine as vaccines for covid had not been created. Fast forward...since covid vaccines have been released under the EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) there is a push to vaccinate everyone on earth with these still under EUA (EXPERIMENTAL) vaccines. 

The notion of medical freedom and privacy has disintegrated before our very eyes. No matter the innumerable reports of failure, injury and death associated with the EUA vaccines, or multiple reported incidents and adverse reactions through the VAERS system, the push to encourage vaccination of everyone, even children and pregnant women exist.

In as early as 2018 the WEF was leading the charge for VACCINE ASSOCIATED IDENTITY through the recognition that "VACCINES ARE AN ENTRY POINT FOR DIGITAL ID" and that children were a valid target to bring about a change in the world vaccination and individual ID status. Through their ID2020 program (remember this was in 2018) the WEF envisioned expansive vaccination for kids and outlined many valid reasons for doing so. So to say that Covid ID is a new or novel idea, is certainly not true. This is simply an opportunist move and a move possibly planned when the partners of the Rockefeller Foundation and Gates Foundation (or entities associated with Bill Gates) are considered.

The WEF is a part of the development and promotion of the Covid Credentials Initiative (CCI). What is the CCI? Let's refer to their website and let the creators of the CCI tell us:

The COVID Credentials Initiative (“CCI”) is an open global community collaborating to enable the interoperable use of open-standard-based privacy-preserving credentials and other related technologies for public health purposes.
‍
The community currently focuses on the application of Verifiable Credentials (VCs), an open standard and emerging technology, which could provide a close experience to physical credentials while offering additional benefits, the most important being privacy-preserving and temper-evident.

We joined Linux Foundation Public Health (LFPH) in Dec 2020 to work together on an open-standard-based open-source approach to COVID credentials. At CCI, we develop specifications (including governance frameworks and other documents), organizing activities and incubating ideas/projects for LFPH and other related communities.

What is a Verifiable Credential (VC)? Once again let's refer to their website for clarification: 

Much like a physical credential (e.g. the cards in one’s wallet), a Verifiable Credential (VC) is an issued assertion containing a set of claims about an individual or organization. The unique value of VCs is that they are digitally native and cryptographically secure, making them a great privacy-preserving alternative to other types of credentials, if used responsibly.

As shown in the illustration, after accepting a VC (e.g. a driver’s license) from a trusted issuer (e.g. a government body), holders can generate a proof with minimum information (e.g. over 18) needed to prove to a verifier (e.g. a liquor store) that they possess VCs with specific characteristics (e.g. age), qualifying them for certain types of access defined by the verifier. And there is no need for direct contact between the issuer and verifier throughout the process. This opens doors to a wide range of solutions to the social and economic challenges incurred as a result of COVID-19.

That is a lot of speak to simply say that this is a PERSONAL & INDIVIDUAL IDENTITY initiative that may begin by sorting out medical information but will ultimately include ALL of an individual's personal and private information which will be updated regularly by and obtained BY THE STATE! 

In other words, this is THE END of personal privacy, personal health information and individual determinism. It is the end of the 4th Amendment of the United States which is a hedge against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. According to WEF goals and objective, everyone will now be a member of the GLOBAL COMMUNITY by which the common language is a universal identity authorized, issued and maintained by a global alliance of government and ultimately and eventually eliminating all rights of privacy. 

Without doubt, NO ONE will be able to BUY/SELL unless one has this MARK, this NAME or NUMBER OF HIS NAME (sequence of numbers associated with personal identity)!

So Far As "The Mark" Or Number

I am not caught up in guessing the personal or individual identity of the "Anti-Christ". In my opinion, while this may be spearheaded and recognized by an individual, it certainly is a system or a method of operation by which the new state runs or conducts itself. However, for those who would like to be more technical biblically centered, I will point you towards and an article at Equip.org entitled "What Is The Meaning Of 666" by Hank Hanegraaff from his book "Apocalypse Code (2007). Hank states this regarding 666 and 616 and who and what the passage may have been referring to:

"Furthermore, unlike today, transforming names into numbers (gematria) was common in antiquity. For example, in the Lives of the Twelve Caesars Roman historian Suetonius identifies Nero by a numerical designation equal to a nefarious deed. This numerical equality (isopsephism) is encapsulated in the phrase: “Count the numerical values of the letters in Nero’s name, and in ‘murdered his own mother’ and you will find their sum is the same.” In Greek the numerical value of the letters in Nero’s name (Greek: Nevrwn, English transliteration: Neron) totaled 1,005, as did the numbers in the phrase murdered his own mother. This ancient numerical cryptogram reflected the widespread knowledge that Nero had killed his own mother.

Finally, while “Nero” in Greek totaled 1,005, the reader of John’s letter familiar with the Hebrew language could recognize that the Greek spelling of “Nero Caesar” transliterated into Hebrew equals 666. Moreover, the presence in some ancient manuscripts of a variation in which 666 is rendered 616 lends further credence to Nero as the intended referent. The Hebrew transliteration of the Latin spelling of “Nero Caesar” totals 616, just as the Hebrew transliteration of the Greek, which includes an additional letter (Greek: “n”=50, English transliteration: “n”=50), renders 666. Thus, two seemingly unrelated numbers lead you to the same doorstep—that of a beast named Nero Caesar. Twenty-first-century believers, like their first-century counterparts, can be absolutely certain that 666 is the number of Nero’s name and that Nero is the beast who ravaged the bride of Christ in a historical milieu that included three and a half years of persecution. In the end, Peter and Paul themselves were persecuted and put to death at the hands of this Beast. Indeed this was the only epoch in human history in which the Beast could directly assail the foundation of the Christian Church of which Christ himself was the cornerstone."

If who John was referring to was Caesar Nero, it certainly WAS NOT confined to or restricted to concluding with the person of Caesar Nero. This was a double entendre and  SPIRITUALLY defined vision as opposed to solely naturally defined one. What we are dealing with and what the bible is pointing to is a principality, a "spiritual wickedness" or reigning idea, that has existed since the early church was founded, with an effort or purpose of diminishing the Church and Christ. The world's system is designed to weaken the church's influence, foundation and overtake it as an entity. 

Let me be clear...the FACT is that HIS CHURCH will not fail! We are overcomers and will overcome the world and the enemy of the church and our souls is ALREADY DEFEATED!

Has anyone wondered why, since the beginning of the alleged pandemic, all over the world, the FIRST restrictions were placed on the Church and Churches? In fact in the United States, in nearly all venues, whether they were overseen by Republican conservatives or liberal Democrats, the CHURCH was not mentioned or declared to be "essential". Bars and liquor stores were given rights to operate without restriction, while churches were driven to online operation and function and told they could not assemble. Church leaders further cowered down to health department regulations and in many cases health officials who redefined how churches should worship Christ. Many churches have not opened up yet, and are afraid to go against the political narrative even though God and the right of religious freedom is on their side.

The alleged covid 19 pandemic, was a complete DISTRACTION and an entry point for satan to deceive and subjugate the church and alleged believers. If you will put down your FAITH because people said so, or because you are fearful of a disease, that you perceive that even God cannot control, you will PICK UP ANYTHING and ACCEPT anything, thinking that your life is in danger. No, we are to walk in WISDOM, not tempting the Lord, but NOT live in FEAR!

Faith is under attack and is set to be driven out of world affairs as people are stripped of individual freedoms and rights. Jesus recognizes this asking with he find "faith in the earth" when he returns. (LK. 18:8) 

Political expediency and societal collectivism rooted in socialist values have replaced values of individualism and notions of personal and individual freedom that religion inspires. This new redefined set of collectivist/capitalistic values attempts to retain words such as "capitalism" but actually promote actions in the interest of the collective. In other words, what it means to be a free society is being redefined. A brief look at Australia and the atrocities that are occurring there in the name of "public safety" is proof of this. In my opinion,  much of what is happening around the world in response to covid 19 are human rights violations and must be addressed. 

Digital Identity is real and free people are the target and the only prohibitor of this new universal invasion of freedom. Is the idea a bad one. No, it is pleasing to the eyes and DESIREABLE for gaining wisdom. (Gen. 3:6) However, like in Eve's case what is actually being presented is something different. Do I believe that people associated with these ideas are evil? NO! Not all of them. However I do believe that there are evil people at the wheel in many cases. I believe we have others that are under the influence, whether wittingly or not, of powers and ideas that are not their own.

In my next article I will address the recent statements of world renown Psychiatrist Peter Breggin who calls the individuals involved in the covid 19 mitigations strategy that has been embraced by the world, EVIL and produces receipts to that effect. STAY TUNED

Until then, my only question...Where is the CHURCH and REAL church leadership?

Read more!

Hip-Hop, Idolatry & The Church Pt. 24 ~ Waka Flocka FIRE

"...people out here marketing the wrong things man. Sometimes I kinda contradicted myself, because when I was younger, I was on something different. But when you start seeing reality and then the truth man, you can't run from it man. It's in your face everyday. It's crazy..." ~ Waka Flocka Flame radio interview with "The Breakfast Club"

Thanks to my son, H Jeauvon Burnett III for bringing this subject to my attention...

It seems that there are some withing the hip-hop community that are not deceived over the current marketing and placement of the homosexual agenda and they are sick of it. One such artist is rapper Waka Flocka Flame (Jaquin James Malphurs age 29) currently hailing from Atlanta, GA. 

"y'u-know what the world is today man? Women are afraid to be a wife, and young males are afraid to be a man. It's not cool man, y'u-know they don't market that"..."they marketing evil" ~ Waka Flocka Flame radio interview with "The Breakfast Club"

It seems that Waka Flocka is not even close to being deceived about, 1-the nature or God, meaning that he does not buy into the current worldly understanding that God is deceptive in his creation, especially as it pertains to the sexuality of men and mankind and 2- the marketing and recasting of the homosexual agenda, to make things appear that homosexuality is or should be either normal is tantamount to evil.

"you are who you are when God made you, not who you become"..."you rebuking God man"~ Waka Flocka Flame radio interview with "The Breakfast Club"

The Dunamis Word MUST join this Hip-Hop adherent in saying KUDOS and THANK YOU for understanding and articulating what many in the church and many in church leadership don't understand and if they do, refuse to articulate for fear of unpopularity and social upheaval.  

Although the interview goes into other issues such as politics, finance and Waka's relationship both in marriage and with his business partners, this young man's position on the homosexual agenda, transgenderism and the message that is currently being sent to young people within society is very clear. He ain't down with the DECEPTION!

At the end of the day, I am curious to see how the world responds to this young man and I pray that he maintains the truth that has been revealed to him on this issue and continues to seek greater truth within Christ Jesus to avoid the "seven sons of Sceva syndrome" (Acts 19) which has silenced a many individuals who seek to help the community but that do not have the power necessary to do so...This is certainly one minister that will be praying.

Blessed! 

Read more!

Evil, Who Knows It And How? Pt. 2

This article is continued from Part 1 found HERE.

The Complete article is available at The Dunamis Word 2.

III: Can Them That Are Lost Confidently Know What Evil Really Is?

Everything in the natural world (HIS creation) only has extrinsic value and goodness as declared by God himself. This is called a metaphysical value statement. Extrinsic values are derivative values, therefore intrinsic values preceed extrinsic values. This is the problem with idol worship or any exaltation of "things" above God, as those "things", idols or whatever they may be have no intrinsically good value. Their value is only given and accounted for based on subjective ascriptions of value. This concept should also give additional insight into the writings of Paul in Romans 1:25 when he said:

"Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen."

The "creature" here represented men and mankind as well as the pleasures of this world. In reference to natural things one does not normally say that there is an "evil" tree or an "evil" rock. Once again, the identification that a tree or rock is not evil in and of itself is an ascription of value to that object. The rock or tree only becomes evil when their use is perverted or corrupted in some manner. For the Christian this is confirmed within the creation when God said this:

Gen. 1:31 ~ "And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good"

God declared that everything that he had made was good from the time that he made it. By declaration of God this is an example of the creation being declared extrinsically good. This is called an extrinsic value declaration.

What is unaccounted for by the philosophical crowd is the difference that came into existence after the fall:

Genesis 3:17-19 ~ "17-And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; 18-Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field; 19-In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return."

By the exercise of the freewill that God had given to man, the very creation that God had made and called good, had now been cursed. Please note extrinsic value of the creation changed so much that even the creation itself cries to be redeemed as noted by Paul in Romans:

Romans 8:22 ~ "For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now."

Spinoza Unraveled:

In Spinoza's understanding as referenced previously within this article, "evil" would only be applied to something after the consideration of the benefits to which those actions are applied. Corruption of what is good was not a consideration for Spinoza. All was purely based on a persons relationship to what was done. For example, killing, though generally held to be "evil", under certain circumstances may not be "evil" because it may be for self-defense or self preservation. Therefore the concept of klling may not be thoroughly or absolutely evil.

The little trick here deals with the "own temperment" part of Spinoza's statement. This rests upon a persons basis for carrying out the action. Using killing as an example again, under Spinoza's construction, "evil" would not be applied to killing if killing were in line with the killer's own standard of moral justification no matter what suffering results from the action. In fact in war killing is praised as long as the enemy is the one killed. Therefore, the act of killing takes on a relative and subjective position and moral value under certain circumstances.

Another example may include a person who steals out of what they think is necessity for their family to eat. Although thievery is wrong in some cases it may be looked upon as a noble and sincere action to prevent further uncomfort or evil from occurring.

The Christian must admit that these statements seem to be a highly plausible statements and ones that appear to have validity. God who abhors murder also told the children of Israel to possess the land of promise and in many cases kill or destroy all the inhabitants of the land.

Deut. 9:3-4a ~ "3-Understand therefore this day, that the LORD thy God is he which goeth over before thee; as a consuming fire he shall destroy them, and he shall bring them down before thy face: so shalt thou drive them out, and destroy them quickly, as the LORD hath said unto thee. 4-Speak not thou in thine heart, after that the LORD thy God hath cast them out from before thee, saying, For my righteousness the LORD hath brought me in to possess this land: "

The critic happily assesses that even God's moral values are subjective and based on his whims or are arbitrary in nature, but is that really the case?

First, God has declared that he is the Lord and he changes not:

Malachi 3:6 ~ "For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed."

Heb. 13:8 ~ "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever."

Being the only uncaused cause, God's steadfastness is clear. God's nature remains the same. God's intents remain the same from all etrnity. What the critic misses is that God has also said that he abhors evil and the sin that man continues to choose. Remember, God had a disdain for sin before sin even existed. Being omniscient he accounted for it before the world was founded as jesus was a "Lamb slain from the foundation of the world". (Rev. 13:8) The people in Caanan were idolotrous and full of all the sins that God said he despises. The elimination of sin, would not have been a violation of God's nature or a subjective value change of God's nature but was fully in accord with the nature of God. Look at what he said in the same verses of scripture regarding Caanan's destruction:

Deut. 9:4b-5 ~"4b-For my righteousness the LORD hath brought me in to possess this land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD doth drive them out from before thee. 5-Not for thy righteousness, or for the uprightness of thine heart, dost thou go to possess their land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee, and that he may perform the word which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob."

God's righteousness cannot be separated from his nature. He has eternally set forth the standard of righteousness and his "temperment" is made known from the beginning. Therefore he is consistent in demanding justice for sins committed and that consistency overrides what men call moral subjectivism.

So the view of the world regarding "evil' is all based on concepts of subjective rationalism and those concepts do not and cannot apply to God as his standards have been set much further than what men have traditionally given him credit for. As you can see, to not have an understanding of the objective nature of the morality of God only leads to blatant absurdities.

Possibility vs. Actualization:

The duality of 'good versus evil' is expressed, in some form or another, by many cultures. Those who believe in the duality theory of evil believe that evil cannot exist without good, nor good without evil, as they are both objective states and opposite ends of the same scale.

In the Christian worldview evil exists as an exercise of the human agency of free-will. This thought is highly effective when one realizes first that freedom is not about having unlimited choices. Freedom is about having the unfettered ability to make a choice. God made man free moral agents and beings via that process he also extended to man the opportunity actualize evil. Therefore, God by creating free moral agents also created the possibility of evil, however man made the actuality of evil by the exercise of his free-will. For God to have created without the ability to do evil would have been manipulation plain and simple and would have destroyed free-will and freedom alltogether.

God could also not have created anything, however that sentiment completely overlooks the fact that what God did create was good and without corruption, therefore God did not create and is not responsible for the actualization of evil in this present world. In short, God certainly created the possibility of evil, however man made evil the actual reality and his choice even effected the echosystem or the natural world in which we live.

Summary:

I propose that evil exists in our world today and that we recognize evil as either corruption or perversion of what is good.

I propose that "evil' cannot be distinguished as 'evil' in an of itself without the light of God through the inner conscience indicating what is good and therefore without corruption.

I believe that all men have been given some sort of illumination of conscience due to the fact that the light has entered into the world from eternity through Jesus.

I propose that since the Holy Spirit is present in the world today to "reprove" the world of sin thereby revealing the moral standards of God to both believer and nonbeliever alike.

It is evident that the world has labeled and branded actions as either "evil" or "good" because of the Holy Spirit's intervention. However, many of those standards have been made to be subjective by sinful man and fail to address the intrinsic nature, value actions or essence of what is being observed.

The atheist has been blinded to the fact that the only way he/she can recognize evil is because of the objective standard of God's good and the recognition of the effect of sin upon what is good and pure.

I propose that since evil does exist, it can only be revealed and known to be evil as a result of God's good, and HIS intervention in the current world, and that Christians are best suited to distinguish it because of the acceptance of the objective moral standards of God.

Blessed!

Read more!

Evil, Who Knows It And How? Pt. 1

Gen. 3:4-5 ~ "4-And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5-For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."

The Atheist Bus Campaign proudly hails that humanity doesn't need to worry because there is" probably no God". The American Humanists claim that we don't need God to be good and that individuals can just "be good for goodness sake". These statements assume that belief in God is nonessential to life and that an individual can discern and know what is good on their own. The problem is that in order to be good one must also know what is bad or evil and be able to distinguish the difference.

The focus of this article is to examine the human epistemology of good and evil. This is better stated as how and on what basis do individuals know what is good or bad. This article will look specifically at the knowledge of "evil" and how evil is discerned both in the life of the Christian and in the life of the unsaved or atheist.

I intend to ask and answer the following questions in this article:

1- What is evil and where does it come from?

2- How does one come to identify what is evil?

3- Can them that are lost confidently know what evil really is?

4- How is the Christian concept of evil superior to the atheistic concept of evil?

I: What Is Evil And Where Does It Come From?

In many philosophical circles, evil is defined as morally objectionable behavior or that which causes harm destruction and/or misfortune. For many, it is said that evil emanates from immorality which is the quality of not being in accord with standards of right. Evil is equivalent to being wicked or possessing iniquity.

Throughout history, it has been thought that unpleasurable things are evil. In fact the Plato's (428-347 B.C.E.) view of evil which was gained from his teacher Socrates (470-399 B.C.E.) he stated that the only reason why the pleasures of food and drink seem to be evil is that they result in pain and deprive us of future pleasures. {Plato Progaras, 353e}

Socrates (in Plato's early work) argued, that which we call evil is merely ignorance and that good is that which everyone desires. Benedict de Spinoza said that the difference between good and evil is merely one of personal inclinations:

"So everyone, by the highest right of Nature, judges what is good and what is evil, considers his own advantage according to his own temperament... ."

If you are careful to notice, the term "evil" is normally used as a descriptive based on concepts of relativistic or subjective thought. In other words "evil" according to most, is only "evil' as it relates to its relative position to an individual, culturally acceptable standards of the community or personal moral assessments. In other words "evil' as it is described in modern society is nothing more than a figment of the imagination.

Philosophically Speaking:

There are generally three types of evil pointed to in most circles:

1- Moral Evil ~ Evil as a result of choice of moral agents

2- Natural Evil ~ Evil that occurs as a result of natural circumstance beyond our control

3- Non moral Evil~ Evil that occurs as a result of accident or neglect.

Augustine To The Rescue:

St. Augustine, in his defense of the faith "On The Morals Of The Manichaens, [5.7]" set forth the concept that evil is not the absence of good, as is commonly taught in philosophical circles, but the corruption of good. His argument is summarized as follows:

1- Corruption is a general definition of evil.

2- Corruption, which is not a substance, does not exist by itself but in what it corrupts.

3- Corruption is only identified when whatever is corrupted by it looses integrity and purity.

4- That which has no integrity or purity cannot be corrupted.

5- Therefore for anything to suffer corruption or perversion implies the presence of integrity, purity and ultimately good.

In the Christian worldview evil is better stated as being the corruption of good or of what has integrity and purity, not the absence of good. In other words evil cannot be identified unless it is set against a standard that is not corrupted to begin with.

In some cases evil is the lack of an appropriate relationship between good things. Example, Boots are good, a persons face can be and is generally good, but a boot on a face is an inappropriate relationship especially when there was nothing done to deserve it.

Evil can also be the lack of something that should be there in relationship between good things. For example, the husband that mistreats his wife or father that abuses his children. He does so because he lack the love that he should have for his spouse and children, while at the same time he may either love someone else or love some other activity that assists him eliminating or lowering his love for his family. The problem is not that there is no love, love exists, but there is a serious lack of love or maybe even hatred for what should be loved.

II: How Does One Come To Identify Evil?

The Philosophical Dilemma

I point out yet another philosophical dilemma regarding evil. This deals with both the ethical view of evil and the epistemological understanding or awareness of evil. That epistemological understanding of evil simply asks or seeks to find out how one knows or identifies evil.

Views on the nature of evil tend to fall into one of four opposed camps:

Moral absolutism holds that good and evil are fixed concepts established by a deity or deities, nature, morality, common sense, or some other source.

Amoralism claims that good and evil are meaningless, as there are no deities, no moral ingredient in nature. Amoralists tend to apply a homo economicus style of making decisions in their lives.

Moral relativism holds that standards of good and evil are only products of local culture, custom, or prejudice.

Moral universalism is the attempt to find a compromise between the absolutist sense of morality, and the relativist view; universalism claims that morality is only flexible to a degree, and that what is truly good or evil can be determined by examining what is commonly considered to be evil amongst all humans.

Value Statements

The view that something is either good or bad of itself is called intrinsicism. Intrinsic values are nonderivative values. In other words something is either good or bad without regard to who or what it is good or bad to or for. There is a problem with intricism. Anything good on its own has nothing to compare itself to. In other words there is no contrast offered by which something that is truly good without respect to whom it's good to can really be assessed as being good. Therefore intrinsic worth is a circular argument in many cases.

This is where it gets interesting. For one to identify evil, one would also have to assign or have assigned a set of values as a contrast to the assessment being made. Those values may be based on subjective or objective means, but there is a value relationship and value assertion nonetheless, otherwise there can be no identification of anything evil or corrupt. Current philosophical understandings of intricism do not address this particular issue and fail to account for initial value judgements and assertions. This is done primarily due to the belief that community in many cases, is responsible for value judgements. This thought is probably one of the worst of all arguments and certainly has shown not to be the case. Why? First, because nearly all cultures, varying as they may be, and in some cases not in touch with either at all, hold to certain standards and values in high esteem that are seemingly universal, such as charity, selflessness, nurturing of others etc. These standards are always held out as being virtuous from culture to culture without having been derived from any particular culture or social setting.

Secondly, value assessments and judgements are made regularly regarding these matters outside of community from culture to culture and third, if one says that good values are learned from family and maternal "passings on", then one is right back where we started asking for the first cause of the value judgement ie: where did your mommas, mommas, momma get that from and then where did they get it from. A trail of infinite regression that leads back to a beginning either way where a standard was set forth.

Fourth, the bible accords that God is the only intrinsically good being. For something to have intrinsic value means that it can be valuable or not, good or bad, without reference to who it is good or bad for, and without reference to the reason it is good or bad. Although this statement for a philosopher is a self-defeating, in our current condition, we can identify good when we identify evil since evil is the corruption of what is good. In the case of God he is self-ascribed as the self-existent one who is good.

Exodus 3:14 ~ "And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you."

Blessed!

Read more!