tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2357475346759651140.post7489977967835707320..comments2024-03-27T11:13:34.520-05:00Comments on The Dunamis Word: "Watch This" Pt. 3 ~ Don Lemon, "No Winners"...What Of The Victims?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2357475346759651140.post-14777224459932550622010-09-29T11:05:36.907-05:002010-09-29T11:05:36.907-05:00While that may be technically correct so far as ph...While that may be technically correct so far as physical contact is concerned, the suits "allege" that Long began his mental and psychological advances before these guys were of age. <br /><br />As we'll note later today on this blog, one of the claimants was 14 years old when Long began to single him out and manipulate him psychologically. <br /><br />If this is true (which I HOPE it's not) then I believe a strong case could be made that he is a pedophile.District Supt. Harvey Burnetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15315686602819371111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2357475346759651140.post-68454866845648028672010-09-29T10:59:59.071-05:002010-09-29T10:59:59.071-05:00Of course he's not a pedophile. A pedophile is...Of course he's not a pedophile. A pedophile is someone, an adult, that prefers prebupescent children. They were `17 and 18, well past childhood. So no, Bishop Long is not a pedophile.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com