tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2357475346759651140.post6451534739645006660..comments2024-03-27T11:13:34.520-05:00Comments on The Dunamis Word: Was Bishop Larry Shaw Defamed? Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2357475346759651140.post-85558966940535724302013-10-20T20:44:48.604-05:002013-10-20T20:44:48.604-05:00Me too. He claims that the Sheards and death threa...Me too. He claims that the Sheards and death threats made him sign the statement. If that is the case, then what "made" him tell Shaw's attorney that he knew Sheard was guilty and try to get $2,000 to testify on his behalf. With a signed affidavit, the testimony would be moot. Ambition and the desire to be popular is a complete mess. District Supt. Harvey Burnetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15315686602819371111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2357475346759651140.post-20597678087051557112013-10-20T15:00:19.771-05:002013-10-20T15:00:19.771-05:00I believe when Bishop Shaw's attorney posted t... I believe when Bishop Shaw's attorney posted the audio clip it was officially over for Mr. McCray. Ann Brockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10273380949544392923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2357475346759651140.post-19063591707925957122013-10-20T14:09:30.513-05:002013-10-20T14:09:30.513-05:00One cannot conspire to make false statements under...One cannot conspire to make false statements under any circumstance, but especially under penalty of perjury and for gain and to destroy a persons's reputation. <br /><br />It has come out clearly that Bishop Shaw WAS defamed at the hands of William McCray who evidently knew that the document he posted was full of false information. Mr. McCray has been forced to <a href="http://obnoxioustv.wordpress.com/2013/10/18/19596/#comments" rel="nofollow">issue a public apology</a>regarding the incident. This is not merely an act of humility, he is fighting for his life. Unfortunately for him, he will also have to face a judge for a determination of perjury because he signed a statement making the claim that Bishop Sheard did not try to give him money to post the document while simultaneously telling Bishop Shaw's attorney that he did and demanding money from Shaw to testify on his behalf. One of those things are true, but both cannot possibly be true. <br /><br />William, you've been CHOKED by your sin. Thankfully you acknowledge it. You still may find grace as the judge make show leniency. I hope so. I certainly don't wish the worst on ANYONE including you!<br /><br />So far as the real deal, Mr. McCray says that Bishop Sheard's network was and is a network of intimidation and the only reason he signed a statement exonerating Sheard was out of fear for his life. In other words he signed it under duress. That may be his out. If this is true (which I find it hard to believe) the character of Bishop Sheard is now impugned to the highest degree. As I have known him, that does not match his character....<br /><br />The HOLY GHOST certainly knows who is lying. That for sure, if nothing else, will come out. District Supt. Harvey Burnetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15315686602819371111noreply@blogger.com